Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

OBJECTIVE: To compare different assessments following shoulder surgery for impingement syndrome with or without rotator cuff tear or repair. METHODS: A prospective study of 93 patients was conducted. Standard assessments were performed before, at 6 months, and at 4 years following shoulder surgery using the patient-based Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire, and a surgeon-assessed Constant Shoulder Score. Patients were categorized according to the surgery received in relation to the presence of cuff tears: full repair, partial repair, cuff tear/no repair, no tear/no repair. RESULTS: Most patients (57%) received subacromial decompression for impingement with no cuff tear. This group had the fewest pre- and postoperative symptoms. The category of patients who received only partial repair of a cuff tear had worse scores on all outcome assessments compared with other groups. Patient-based measures were more stable over time than the Constant. CONCLUSION: The shoulder-specific measures had greater sensitivity than the SF-36 in registering significant differences in outcomes between comparison groups at 6 months and 4 years.

Original publication

DOI

10.1002/art.10659

Type

Journal article

Journal

Arthritis Rheum

Publication Date

15/10/2002

Volume

47

Pages

513 - 519

Keywords

Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Prospective Studies, Rotator Cuff, Rotator Cuff Injuries, Shoulder Joint, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome